ReviewCancer medicine2025
Advancing Precision Medicine: The Role of Genetic Testing and Sequencing Technologies in Identifying Biological Markers for Rare Cancers.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Histopathologic and Targeted Genomic Characterization of Gastric Adenocarcinomas with Yolk Sac Tumor Differentiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Harnessing archaeogenetic for cancer therapy: bridging ancient DNA insights with modern therapeutic innovations.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- Virtual screening of novel alkaloids as potent inhibitors for G2032R-mutant ROS1 kinase in non-small-cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association between tumor genomic mutations and the risk of PD-1 inhibitor-induced hypophysitis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Optimized digital polymerase chain reaction enables detection of telomerase reverse transcriptase C228T mutation for prognostic assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- PEI-FeBiosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic testing and sequencing technologies offer a comprehensive understanding of cancer genetics, providing rapid and cost-effective solutions. In particular, these advanced technologies play an important role in assessing the complexities of the rare cancer types affecting several systems including the bone, endocrine, digestive, vascular, and soft tissue. This review will explore how genetic testing and sequencing technologies have contributed to the identification of biomarkers across several rare cancer types in diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic stages, thereby advancing PM.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science using keywords related to sequencing technologies, genetic testing, and cancer. There were no restrictions on language, methodology, age, or publication date. Both primary and secondary research involving humans or animals were considered.
resultsIn practice, fluorescence in situ hybridization, karyotype, microarrays and other genetic tests are mainly applied to identify specific genetic alterations and mutations associated with cancer progression. Sequencing technologies, such as next generation sequencing, polymerase chain reaction, whole genome or exome sequencing, enable the rapid analysis of millions of DNA fragments. These techniques assess genome structure, genetic changes, gene expression profiles, and epigenetic variations. Consequently, they help detect main intrinsic markers that are crucial for personalizing diagnosis, treatment options, and prognostic assessments, leading to better patient prognosis. This highlights why these methods are now considered as primary tools in rare cancer research. However, these methods still face multiple limitations, including false positive results, limited precision, and high costs.
conclusionGenetic testing and sequencing technologies have significantly advanced the field of rare cancer research by enabling the identification of key biomarkers for precision diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Despite existing limitations, their integration into clinical and research fields continues to improve the development of personalized medicine strategies for rare and complex cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.