ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
GRLGRN: graph representation-based learning to infer gene regulatory networks from single-cell RNA-seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring cell-specific gene regulatory networks based on causal graph embedding.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- AutoGERN: single-cell RNA-seq gene regulatory network inference via explicit link modeling and adaptive architectures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- GRNFormer: accurate gene regulatory network inference using graph transformer.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- TDAGENE: Inference of Gene Regulatory Network Based on Topological Data Analysis and Graph Attention Network for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA gene regulatory network (GRN) is a graph-level representation that describes the regulatory relationships between transcription factors and target genes in cells. The reconstruction of GRNs can help investigate cellular dynamics, drug design, and metabolic systems, and the rapid development of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology provides important opportunities while posing significant challenges for reconstructing GRNs. A number of methods for inferring GRNs have been proposed in recent years based on traditional machine learning and deep learning algorithms. However, inferring the GRN from scRNA-seq data remains challenging owing to cellular heterogeneity, measurement noise, and data dropout.
resultsIn this study, we propose a deep learning model called graph representational learning GRN (GRLGRN) to infer the latent regulatory dependencies between genes based on a prior GRN and data on the profiles of single-cell gene expressions. GRLGRN uses a graph transformer network to extract implicit links from the prior GRN, and encodes the features of genes by using both an adjacency matrix of implicit links and a matrix of the profile of gene expression. Moreover, it uses attention mechanisms to improve feature extraction, and feeds the refined gene embeddings into an output module to infer gene regulatory relationships. To evaluate the performance of GRLGRN, we compared it with prevalent models and performed ablation experiments on seven cell-line datasets with three ground-truth networks. The results showed that GRLGRN achieved the best predictions in AUROC and AUPRC on 78.6% and 80.9% of the datasets, and achieved an average improvement of 7.3% in AUROC and 30.7% in AUPRC. The interpretation discussion and the network visualization were conducted.
conclusionsThe experimental results and case studies illustrate the considerable performance of GRLGRN in predicting gene interactions and provide interpretability for the prediction tasks, such as identifying hub genes in the network and uncovering implicit links.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.