ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and external validation of a machine learning model to predict bronchopulmonary dysplasia using dynamic factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and digital technologies transforming neonatal respiratory assessment: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Lung Ultrasound in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Diagnostic Tool, Prognostic Marker or Monitoring Strategy?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Video-based artificial intelligence for automated neonatal respiratory monitoring.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia seven days after birth using respiratory and oxygenation timeseries with machine learning.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Disruption of the gut bile acid-microbiota axis precedes severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We hypothesized that incorporating postnatal dynamic factors would enhance the prediction accuracy of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. This retrospective cohort study included neonates born before 32 weeks of gestation at Seoul National University Hospital between 2013 and 2022. The primary outcome was moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. We assessed both static perinatal risk factors and dynamic factors, such as respiratory support type, inspired oxygen concentration, and blood gas analysis results within the first 7 days. The model was developed using data from 546 infants born between 2013 and 2021, with internal validation on 75 infants born in 2022. External validation was based on 105 infants recruited at the Boramae Medical Center. The integrated prediction model, combining static and dynamic factors, showed superior predictive performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.841 in the development set, outperforming the static perinatal factor model. Internal validation confirmed the robustness of the integrated model (AUROC: 0.912 vs. 0.805, p < 0.0001). The performance was maintained in the external validation (AUROC: 0.814). Incorporating early respiratory support and blood gas analysis into predictive models substantially improved the accuracy of bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction in preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.