Trial reportBMC psychology2025
Counselor type (Human/AI) and consultation intention: a moderated mediation model of trust and psychological counseling scenarios.
Trial report in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Efficacy of Rule-Based Versus Large Language Model-Based Chatbots in Alleviating Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn some services involving social and emotional needs (such as psychological counseling), people seem to prefer human services over AI. Exploring the psychological mechanisms behind this preference can help increase people's acceptance of AI-based psychological counseling. This study aims to explore the differences in people's consultation intention for human versus AI across different counseling scenarios, as well as the role of trust (including cognitive and emotional trust) between humans and AI.
methodsA total of 477 participants (297 in Study 1 and 180 in Study 2) were randomly assigned to different groups for counseling imagination tasks and then completed self-report questionnaires.
resultsThe results of Study 1 demonstrated a significantly higher consultation intention towards human counselors in social emotional scenarios, while no significant preference was observed in cognitive analytical scenarios. Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1, and further revealed that: (1) cognitive and affective trust played a multiple mediating role between counselor type and consultation intention in social emotional scenarios; (2) there existed a suppressing effect in the relationship model between cognitive trust, counselor type, and counseling intentions in cognitive analytical scenarios; (3) psychological counseling scenarios moderated the relationship between cognitive trust/counselor type and consultation intention.
conclusionThese findings offer practical guidance for the development of AI-driven psychological consultation products and carry theoretical implications for research pertaining to human-AI interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.