Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254626›Full record

ReviewNeurological research and practice2025

Should we stay or should we go? Recent insights on drug discontinuation in multiple sclerosis.

Anne Mrochen, Sven G Meuth, Steffen Pfeuffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Art of Sequencing Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne MrochenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Steffen PfeufferDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. steffen.Pfeuffer@neuro.med.uni-giessen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-4845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe decision to discontinue disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is a critical clinical challenge. Historically, DMTs were discontinued due to side effects, treatment limitations, or progression to secondary progressive MS. However, advancements in MS therapies, particularly high-efficacy DMTs (HE-DMTs) and the increased knowledge on disease courses and phenotypes have resulted in more personalized treatment approaches and introduced discussion on scheduled DMT discontinuation. This review explores the current evidence on DMT discontinuation, focusing on its implications for aging populations and the interplay between cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and MS. CURRENT EVIDENCE AND INTERPLAY WITH CVD: Randomized trials such as DISCOMS and DOT-MS have provided insights into discontinuing DMTs in stable patients. In summary, both randomized clinical trials highlight the risk of disease reactivation following treatment discontinuation. Due to the limited sample size, neither study was able to conduct subgroup analyses based on age groups. Additionally, DOT-MS was terminated prematurely, direct comparisons with other studies should be avoided. While older studies and observational data (e.g., OFSEP) have shown relapse risks associated with discontinuation, particularly for drugs like natalizumab and fingolimod, there is limited data on HE-DMT discontinuation outcomes. Comorbidities, particularly CVDs, further complicate decisions regarding the continuation of DMTs in older adults. MS patients bear a higher burden of CVD, which is also associated with unfavorable disease courses. While optimizing cardiovascular risk profiles appears advisable, it remains unclear whether DMTs themselves have a positive impact on CVDs.

conclusionGiven the complexities associated with discontinuing DMTs in MS patients, it is essential to balance the avoidance of polypharmacy with the potential risks of disease reactivation and the impact of comorbidities, especially CVDs, on disease progression. The interplay between MS and CVD highlights the importance of a holistic risk assessment when considering DMT discontinuation.

Indexed as

AgeingCardiovascular diseaseMultiple sclerosisTreatment discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID40254626
PMCPMC12010584

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.