ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Identifying emergency presentations of chronic liver disease using routinely collected administrative hospital data.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Presenting to Emergency Departments in Australia.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Aetiology and outcomes of emergency admissions for chronic liver disease in England, 2012-2019: a national cohort study using administrative data.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Normal liver enzymes do not indicate safety from alcohol-related liver disease: evidence from a Korean nationwide cohort.Epidemiology and health · 2026Article
- Reconsidering the urea-to-creatinine ratio as a signal of muscle catabolism in patients with cirrhosis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) are often first diagnosed during an emergency hospital admission, when their disease is advanced and survival is very poor. Evaluating their care and outcomes is a clinical research priority, but methods are needed to identify them in routine data. Methods: We analysed national administrative hospital data in the English National Health Service. We used existing literature, expert clinical opinion, and data-driven approaches to develop three algorithms to identify first-time emergency admissions in 2017-2018. We validated these in 2018-2019 data by assessing the distributions of predictive factors, treatments, and outcomes associated with CLD in the patients captured by each algorithm. Results: Our most specific algorithm identified 10,719 patients with CLD who first presented through emergency hospital admission from April 2018 to March 2019. Alternative, less specific or more sensitive algorithms identified 12,867 or 20,828 patient, respectively. Additional patients identified by more sensitive algorithms had more comorbidities, were less likely to die from CLD, and were less likely to be treated by a gastroenterologist or hepatologist. Conclusions: Three algorithms are provided that successfully identified patients in administrative hospital data with a first emergency admission for CLD. The choice of algorithm should reflect the aims of the research. Impact and implications: The more and most sensitive algorithms are recommended in studies when it is important to minimise the number of patients with CLD erroneously missed from the cohort, such as studies measuring disease burden. The most specific algorithms might miss patients whose primary reason for admission is recorded as a sign, symptom, or complication of CLD, but is recommended when the interest is strictly in patients whose primary reason for emergency admission is CLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.