ReviewSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Regional anesthesia in obese patients: Challenges, considerations, and solutions.
Review in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anesthetic complications of extensive spinal nerve block and total spinal anesthesia during percutaneous endoscopic spinal surgery under local anesthesia.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Precision and safety advantages of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in geriatric anesthesia: current status and future prospects.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Ultrasound versus C-arm fluoroscopic-guided subarachnoid block in patients with predicted difficulty for subarachnoid block posted for infraumbilical surgeries: A prospective randomized controlled study.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing global prevalence of obesity has significant implications for anesthesiologists, particularly in the context of regional anesthesia. Anesthesiologists face numerous challenges during anesthesia in obese patients, including compromised respiratory function, altered pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics, and difficulties in identifying anatomical landmarks. Obesity often leads to reduced respiratory reserve, increased risk of hypoventilation, and conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome, which increase the likelihood of postoperative complications. Additionally, altered body composition in obese patients affects the distribution of local anesthetics, requiring adjustments in dosing based on lean body weight rather than total body weight. Furthermore, excess adipose tissue complicates the identification of anatomical landmarks and the use of ultrasound for regional block procedures, as the increased tissue depth and reduced image resolution hinder needle placement. Proper positioning, the use of low-frequency transducers, and harmonic imaging techniques are essential for optimizing ultrasound guidance. Additionally, the use of longer needles and the application of trigonometric calculations based on ultrasound scans can help determine the appropriate needle length. To overcome these challenges, anesthesiologists should adopt strategies that involve adjusting drug dosages, utilizing specialized equipment, and continuously monitoring patients for potential complications. A holistic approach involving knowledge of these technical and pathological challenges, as well as adapting techniques and equipment, is crucial for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of regional anesthesia in obese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.