ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Associations Between Total and Regional Fat-to-Muscle Mass Ratio with the Prevalence of Infertility: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary nutrient intake and nutritional status in women with infertility: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association between fat-to-muscle mass ratio and depressive symptoms in U.S. adults: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR) is a novel anthropometric parameter that integrates the antagonistic effects of fat and muscle mass. The current study aimed to examine the associations between total and region-specific FMR with the prevalence of self-reported infertility in US women. Methods: US women aged 20 to 44 years from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included. Total, trunk, arm, and leg FMR were calculated from fat mass and muscle mass in the corresponding body part by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Binary logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis and subgroup analysis were primarily used for statistical analyses. Results: Infertility prevalence was 12.77% among the 1958 women included. Arm and leg FMR were not associated with infertility prevalence, while the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for infertility by each 0.1 point increase in trunk and total FMR were 1.19 (1.07-1.33) and 1.16 (1.04-1.30), respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a positive and linear relationship between trunk or total FMR and infertility prevalence. Subgroup analysis consistently demonstrated that the associations between trunk or total FMR with infertility prevalence were more pronounced in women without a pregnancy history than in those with a pregnancy history. The receiver-operating characteristic curves indicated that the trunk FMR outperformed total, arm, and leg FMR in discriminating infertility from women without infertility. Conclusion: Trunk and total FMR, rather than arm or leg FMR, were associated with an increased risk of infertility in US women, especially those without a prior pregnancy history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.