ArticleHealth science reports2025
Chemical Toxicants Used for Food Preservation in Africa. Is it a Case of Ignorance or Food Fraud? A Review.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food Fraud Implications and Regulatory Challenges in South Africa: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Probiotics and Postbiotics for Green Control of Foodborne Pathogens: Intelligent Detection and Biopreservation Strategies for Safer Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Food Preservatives and the Rising Tide of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Emerging Innovations.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This review examined the use of chemical preservatives in food preservation and the food fraud risks associated with its misuse in Africa. In Africa, there is growing reliance on the use of synthetic chemical preservation such as benzoates, nitrates or sorbates to preserve foods to improve the storage life of the foods, however, the consumers are the eventual victims of the devastating health consequences associated with the use of these preservatives. The review also delves into the issue of food fraud, which involves the intentional addition of harmful chemicals to food products with the aim to prolong their shelf life or improve their look, ultimately resulting in detrimental health effects. Methods: This study employs a comprehensive methodology involving a literature review, data collection from diverse sources, case study analysis, technological assessment of food fraud detection, and policy review to examine the use of chemical toxicants in food preservation and their regulation across Africa. Results: The risks of chemical adulteration are demonstrated by case studies from several African nations, including the use of formalin to preserve meat and hazardous chemicals in bread and dairy products and the use of chemicals like dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, sniper, and gamalin-20 in preserving fruits and vegetables. The review also emphasizes the carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity, and dangers to reproductive health associated with chemical contaminants. Conclusion: To reduce the risks connected to chemical preservatives and food fraud in Africa, stricter regulations and increased public knowledge are required, stakeholders should embrace innovative strategies including tailored education, regional cooperation, and advanced food preservation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.