Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256169›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

RNA secondary structure prediction by conducting multi-class classifications.

Jiyuan Yang, Kengo Sato, Martin Loza, Sung-Joon Park, Kenta Nakai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiyuan YangDepartment of Computer Science, the Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656, Tokyo, Japan.
Kengo SatoSchool of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 2-12-1-M6-12, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, 152-8550, Tokyo, Japan.
Martin LozaInstitute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, 108-8639, Tokyo, Japan.
Sung-Joon ParkDepartment of Computer Science, the Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenta NakaiDepartment of Computer Science, the Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating valid predictions of RNA secondary structures is challenging. Several deep learning methods have been developed for predicting RNA secondary structures. However, they commonly adopt post-processing steps to adjust the model output to produce valid predictions, which are complicated and could limit the performance. In this study, we propose a simple method by considering RNA secondary structure prediction as multiple multi-class classifications, which eliminates the need for those complicated post-processing steps. Then, we use this method to train and evaluate our model based on the attention mechanism and the convolutional neural network. Besides, we introduce two additional methods, including data augmentation to further improve the within-RNA-family performance and a method to alleviate the performance drop in the cross-RNA-family evaluation. In summary, we could produce valid predictions and achieve better performance without complex post-processing steps, and we show our additional methods are beneficial to the performance in within-RNA-family and cross-RNA-family evaluations.

Indexed as

Deep learningMulti-class classificationPost-processingRNA secondary structure

Identifiers

PMID40256169
PMCPMC12008525

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.