ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2025
SERPINH1 and CTSZ are Key Markers of Glioma Angiogenesis.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma, as one of the most complex and prognostically variable malignant tumors of the central nervous system, poses a significant challenge to clinical decision-making due to its molecular heterogeneity. This study aims to deepen our understanding of glioma molecular subtypes and explore key gene markers with prognostic and diagnostic value. We utilized an angiogenesis-related gene set and employed the Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) algorithm to successfully identify two distinct prognostic subtypes, with subtype one exhibiting more unfavorable prognostic characteristics. To further elucidate the biological functional differences between these two subtypes, we conducted Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Building on this, we integrated differentially expressed genes between subtypes with core genes revealed by Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) through intersection analysis to pinpoint a series of key candidate genes. Subsequently, we constructed a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network to identify genes occupying central nodes within the network. To screen markers with high specificity and sensitivity for prognosis and diagnosis, we adopted a dual-track strategy: on the one hand, we utilized machine learning algorithms such as Lasso regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) to select core genes, identifying markers that can accurately predict the subtype with a poor prognosis; on the other hand, we employed a comprehensive evaluation system incorporating 101 machine learning ensemble algorithms to further validate and screen prognosis-related genes. Through cross-validation using these two strategies, we ultimately determined SERPINH1 and CTSZ as dual prognostic and diagnostic markers for glioma. This study not only provides a new perspective and tool for the molecular subclassification of glioma but also, through a rigorous multi-algorithm, multi-dimensional screening process, uncovers SERPINH1 and CTSZ as markers with potential clinical translational value. These findings are expected to offer more precise biomarker support for the early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of glioma, potentially paving new avenues for the development of personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. This has far-reaching implications for the clinical management of glioma in the field of neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40257572What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.