Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258272›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Compatibility of the CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2 Health App Assessment Framework With Catalan and Italian Health Authorities' Needs: Qualitative Interview Study.

Petra Hoogendoorn, Mariam Shokralla, Romy Willemsen, Nick Guldemond, María Villalobos-Quesada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra Hoogendoorn *National eHealth Living Lab, Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3824-648X
Mariam ShokrallaNational eHealth Living Lab, Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3052-2606
Romy WillemsenNational eHealth Living Lab, Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2038-8175
Nick GuldemondNational eHealth Living Lab, Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4909-2220
María Villalobos-Quesada *National eHealth Living Lab, Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-1982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth authorities of European Union (EU) member states are increasingly working to integrate quality health apps into their health care systems. Given the current lack of unified EU assessment criteria, the European Commission initiated Technical Specification (TS) CEN-ISO 82304-2:2021-Health and wellness apps-Quality and reliability (hereinafter the "TS") to address the scattered EU landscape of assessment frameworks (AFs) for health apps. The adoption of an AF, such as the TS, falls within member state competence and is considered an uncertainty-reduction process. Evaluations by peers as well as ensuring the compatibility of the TS with the needs of health authorities can reduce uncertainty and mediate harmonization.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the compatibility of the TS with the needs of Catalan and Italian health authorities.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with key informants from a regional (Catalonia in Spain) and national (Italy) health authority, and a thematic analysis was carried out. Main themes were established deductively, following the aspects defined by the value proposition canvas: (1) health authorities' needs ("gains," "pains," and "jobs") and (2) the TS "products and services" and their distinct characteristics ("gain creators" and "pain relievers"). Subthemes were generated inductively. The compatibility of the needs with the TS was theoretically determined by the researchers. The results were visualized using the value proposition canvas. Two participant validation steps confirmed that the most relevant aspects of the predefined themes had been captured.

resultsDespite the diversity of the 2 health authorities, subthemes were common and categorized into 9 gains, 9 pains, and 11 jobs. Key findings include the health authorities' perceived value of, and need for, integrating quality health apps and using an AF (gains), along with the related policy, implementation, and operational activities (jobs). The lack of enabling EU legislation and standardization, resulting in a need for the multiple authorities involved to consent, made achieving an AF challenging (pains). Nine products and services related to the TS and 17 distinct characteristics (eg, its multistakeholder evidence base) were found to be compatible with 3 gains (eg, stimulating the prescription and use of apps), 7 pains (eg, legislation and harmonization issues), and 6 jobs (eg, assessing apps). Indirect effects, 3 anticipated future services, and 1 anticipated gain creator and pain reliever increase this compatibility.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the health authorities share common fundamental needs, and that the TS is compatible with these needs. The identified needs and compatibility can potentially reduce peer authorities' uncertainties in adopting an AF in general and the TS in particular. More research is recommended to confirm and translate our results in other contexts and further fine-tune compatibility to achieve wide adoption of the TS and accelerate the uptake of health apps.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineEuropean UnionHumansInterviews as TopicItalyQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSpainassessment frameworksCataloniadiffusion of innovationsdigital transformationhealth appsItalymHealthmobile healthvalue proposition canvaswellness apps

Identifiers

PMID40258272
PMCPMC12053092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.