ArticleMetallomics : integrated biometal science2025
Pharmacokinetics of metal excretion following different doses of sodium EDTA infusion.
Article in Metallomics : integrated biometal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal-triggered topology switching in bipyridine-modified DNA G-quadruplexes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Salidroside in heavy metal toxicity: a mechanistic review of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic pathways.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026Review
- Selective Reversal of Cu-Amyloid Aggregation Monitored in Real Time by Fluorescence Anisotropy: Ni-Bme-Dach vs EDTA Benchmarks.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Gadolinium toxicity: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and nanoparticle role.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Effects of heavy metal exposure on kidney transplant recipients: mechanisms and clinical implications for graft failure risk.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chelation therapy is a promising approach to mitigating health risks associated with toxic metal exposure, which contributes to cardiovascular disease, neurotoxicity, and other chronic conditions. disodium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is widely used, but its optimal dosing strategy remains unclear. This study evaluates the dose-dependent efficacy of EDTA in mobilizing toxic metals, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and gadolinium (Gd), while minimizing the loss of essential metals like copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn) to optimize therapeutic safety and efficacy. Ten volunteers (≥50 years) received 3 infusions at doses of 0.5, 1, and 3 g of EDTA over 30 min, 1 h, and 3 h, respectively. Urine and blood samples were analyzed pre- and post-infusion to assess pharmacokinetics of metal chelation. Urinary Pb excretion increased by 2200% at 0.5 g, with only a marginal gain at higher doses (3300%), supporting low-dose EDTA efficacy. Urinary Cd clearance required 3 g EDTA due to its strong tissue binding. Notably, Gd excretion increased by up to 78 000% even at 0.5 g EDTA, highlighting EDTA's potential to reduce long-term Gd burden post-MRI. Urinary excretion of essential metals varied, with Mn and Zn loss increasing at higher EDTA doses, underscoring the need for dose optimization while Cu and Ca only showed a clear increase urinary excretion at 3 g EDTA. Overall, a 0.5 g EDTA dose effectively mobilized Pb and Gd while minimizing essential metal depletion, reducing infusion time to 30 min, and improving patient compliance. These findings align with TACT and TACT 2 studies, reinforcing EDTA's long-term benefits in Pb reduction and supporting low-dose EDTA as a safe, efficient, and well-tolerated detoxification strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.