Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259289›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Concurrent effects of high-intensity interval training and vitamin D supplementation on bone metabolism among women diagnosed with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Ahmad H Alghadir, Sami A Gabr, Amir Iqbal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06624657 (Concurrent Effects of High-intensity Interval Training and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Metabolism Among Women Diagnosed With Osteoporosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06624657 completednot on this map

Concurrent Effects of High-intensity Interval Training and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Metabolism Among Women Diagnosed With Osteoporosis

TypeobservationalSponsorKing Saud UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled120ConditionsOsteoporosis, Exercise Overtraining, Vitamin D 25-Hydroxylase DeficiencyArmsvitamin D supplements fo 16 weks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad H AlghadirRehabilitation Research Chair, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia.
Sami A GabrRehabilitation Research Chair, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia.
Amir IqbalRehabilitation Research Chair, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia. physioamir@gmail.com.

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R382), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. RSP2024R382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis is often responsible for bone fragility and increased fracture risk due to the micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue. In addition to nutritional supplements, exercise is considered an adjunct factor in safeguarding bone health. This study aimed to investigate the effects of 16-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with osteoporosis. TRIAL

designThis study used a four-arm pretest-posttest experimental randomized controlled design.

methodsOne hundred twenty sedentary women aged (30-50 years), diagnosed with osteoporosis were recruited in this study. Patients were randomly classified into four groups with 30 patients in each group: control group (normal daily activities), exercise group (HIIT-exercise for 16 weeks), Vitamin D group (vitamin D 800IU/ day for 16 weeks), and concurrent group (HIIT exercise plus vitamin D for 16 weeks). Anthropometric measurements, BMD, and serum levels of vitamin 25-(OH) D, Osteocalcin, s-BAP, and calcium were estimated in all participants before and after exercise training.

resultsSerum samples revealed that bone resorption markers, osteocalcin, total calcium, s-BAP, and vitamin 25(OH) D significantly improved in all groups; there was greater improvement in the HIIT training-vitamin D group than in the HIIT training, vitamin D, and control groups. Furthermore, the HIIT training-vitamin D group showed improvements in hip (right and left) and lumbar spine BMD than the HIIT training, Vitamin D, and Control groups. BMD improvements correlated positively with serum osteocalcin levels and total calcium and negatively with BMI and s-BAP.

conclusionsSixteen weeks of HIIT and vitamin D consumption showed greater benefits for BMD levels in women with osteoporosis than either vitamin D consumption or HIIT training alone. Therefore, HIIT plus vitamin D consumption may be a strategic option to prevent BMD reduction with aging or to slow demineralization.

trial registrationThe study protocol was retrospectively registered at 'ClinicalTrials.gov PRS' under the trial identifier NCT06624657, dated 1/10/2024.

Indexed as

Bone DensityDietary SupplementsHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingOsteoporosisVitamin DAdultBiomarkersCalciumCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCalciumVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OH-D)Bone metabolismBone mineral densityHigh-intensity interval trainingOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID40259289
PMCPMC12010601

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.