SynthesisNursing open2025
Prodromal Symptoms of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.
Synthesis in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translation, validation, predictive analysis of the Italian version of the McSweeney Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction Symptom Survey and symptom cluster characterization in women.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo synthezise quantitative current evidence on the prodromal symptoms experienced by women before the onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), focusing on the prevalence, nature and clinical implications of these symptoms.
designA systematic review.
methodsThe review adhered to Synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines and was registered with the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42024541840). Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo and EMBASE. Included studies were quantitative, focused on women aged ≥ 18 years with confirmed acute coronary syndrome and reported prodromal symptoms. The Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in non-randomized studies of Interventions tools were used for critical appraisal.
resultsOf 2170 identified records, 11 full-text studies were reviewed. The most frequently reported prodromal symptom was unusual fatigue, followed by sleep disturbances and anxiety. Prodromal symptoms often occurred well before the acute event but were frequently misattributed to non-cardiac causes. Chest pain, typically associated with acute coronary syndrome, was less commonly reported as a prodromal symptom in women, complicating timely diagnosis and treatment.
conclusionsThe results highlight the need for increased awareness of these early warning signs among healthcare providers and women themselves. Enhanced recognition and understanding of these symptoms could lead to more timely and accurate diagnosis, ultimately improving outcomes for women at risk of acute myocardial infarction. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: To educate both health professionals and patients about the variability and significance of prodromal symptoms in women is essential to improve outcomes. IMPACT: This study is the first to systematically review and synthesize the existing literature on prodromal symptoms of acute coronary syndrome specifically in women. The results show l that women are more likely to experience a broader and more complex range of prodromal symptoms, including fatigue, sleep disturbances and anticipatory anxiety, which often precede the acute event. The insights provided by our review could lead to significant improvements in the early diagnosis and treatment of AMI in women, ultimately reducing morbidity and mortality rates associated with cardiovascular diseases. REPORTING
methodThe review has adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and has followed Synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.