Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260268›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2025

Pulmonary ultrasound in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia in South Africa: An observational study.

S A van Blydenstein, T Nell, C Menezes, B F Jacobson, S Omar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S A van BlydensteinDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-6218
T NellDivision of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-102X
C MenezesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3838-5359
B F JacobsonDivision of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, National Health Laboratory Service and School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-3112
S OmarDivision of Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8494-1518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary ultrasound techniques have historically been applied to acute lung diseases to describe lung lesions, particularly in critical care. Objectives: To explore the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in hospitalised patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a single-centre prospective, observational study of two groups of adult patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia: those with COVID-19 pneumonia, and those with non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A pulmonologist performed bedside LUS using the Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) protocol, and the findings were verified by an independent study-blinded radiologist. Results: We enrolled 48 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and 24 with non-COVID CAP. The COVID-19 patients were significantly older than those with non-COVID CAP (median (interquartile range (IQR)) age 52 (42 - 62.5) years v. 42.5 (36 - 52.5) years, respectively; p=0.007), and had a lower prevalence of HIV infection (25% v. 54%, respectively; p=0.01) and higher prevalences of hypertension (54% v. 7%; p=0.002) and diabetes mellitus (19% v. 8%; p=0.04). In both groups, close to 30% of the patients had severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. A confluent B-line pattern in the right upper lobe was significantly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia compared with the C pattern (relative risk (RR) 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 - 8.6). Bilateral changes on LUS rather than unilateral or no changes were associated with COVID-19 pneumonia (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.004 - 2.387). There were no statistically significant differences in median (IQR) lung scores between patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non-COVID CAP (8 (4 - 11.5) v. 7.5 (4.5 - 12.5), respectively). Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had a higher than predicted mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21) and a lower total LUS score indicating B lines v. consolidation (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65 - 0.99) to be associated with mortality. Conclusion: Patients with right upper zone consolidation were more likely to have non-COVID CAP than COVID-19 pneumonia. Finding a B pattern as opposed to consolidation was associated with mortality. The admission LUS score was unable to discriminate between COVID-19 and non-COVID CAP, and did not correlate with the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen, clinical severity or mortality. Study synopsis:

Indexed as

COVID-19lung ultrasoundpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40260268
PMCPMC12009502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.