ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Economic costs and medications for diabetes in older patients in Beijing, China: electronic insurance data analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wise Prescriptions: Prevalence and Predictors of Polypharmacy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Structural and morphological dynamics of "on-path" and "off-path" oligomers of human islet amyloid polypeptide.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the aging of population, the proportion of elderly patients with diabetes is gradually increasing, which poses challenges in the management and treatment of diabetes in this population. Methods: The aim of the study was to investigate the temporal changes in the treatment regimens and medical expenditures in older patients with diabetes in Beijing, China. Data of patients with diabetes from the Beijing Medical Insurance Database with medical records from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and secondary outcomes included the number of medications, comorbidities, diabetes-related complications, the estimated annual drug cost, the treatment strategies for elderly diabetic patients, and the classes of drugs prescribed. Results: Data of 598,440 patients with diabetes in 2018 revealed that 49.8% of the recruited patients were female among elderly patients (>65 years old). The most common comorbidity was hypertension (87.6%). Over the 3 years, about 4.51 medications, including 1.88 antiglycemic drugs and 2.63 non-antiglycemic drugs were prescribed in elderly patients. The mean total annual medication cost was ¥12,186 ($1,676), including ¥6,116 ($841) for antiglycemic drugs and ¥6,070 ($835) for non-antiglycemic drugs. Hypertension (cost ¥4,658, $640, mean medications 2.12 for elderly patients), dyslipidemia (¥5,044, $693, 1.70), and coronary heart disease (¥4,004, $550, 1.40) were the top three diseases that caused the increase in the cost and medications. Over the 3 years, more than 94% of elderly diabetic patients received at least one type of antiglycemic drugs, and the α-glucosidase inhibitors and premixed insulin are the most commonly prescribed hypoglycemic drugs and insulin, respectively. Conclusion: Diabetes management in older patients faces challenges due to extensive variability. Medication analysis in this study found that the current situation of comprehensive control of diabetes in elderly patients is worrying, and the complexity of their medication is still on the increasing trend. It is important to select more appropriate antiglycemic drugs to economically benefit the patients and to control the progression of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.