ArticleMolecular oncology2025
Detecting homologous recombination deficiency for breast cancer through integrative analysis of genomic data.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive comparison of homologous recombination deficiency predictors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence integrated multi-omics and multimodal studies promote the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: opportunities, challenges, and future perspectives.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) leads to genomic instability, and patients with HRD can benefit from HRD-targeting therapies. Previous studies have primarily focused on identifying HRD biomarkers using data from a single technology. Here we integrated features from different genomic data types, including total copy number (CN), allele-specific copy number (ASCN) and single nucleotide variants (SNV). Using a semi-supervised method, we developed HRD classifiers from 1404 breast tumours across two datasets based on their BRCA1/2 status, demonstrating improved HRD identification when aggregating different data types. Notably, HRD-positive tumours in ER-negative disease showed improved survival post-adjuvant chemotherapy, while HRD status strongly correlated with neoadjuvant treatment response. Furthermore, our analysis of cell lines highlighted a sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, among predicted HRD-positive lines. Exploring somatic mutations outside BRCA1/2, we confirmed variants in several genes associated with HRD. Our method for HRD classification can adapt to different data types or resolutions and can be used in various scenarios to help refine patient selection for HRD-targeting therapies that might lead to better clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.