Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260644›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of andrology2025

Microfluidic systems in testicular in vitro culture: a powerful model tool for spermatogenesis and reprotoxicity studies.

Botho Maximilian Schneider, Hande Irem Hamurcu, Andrea Salzbrunn, Kathrein von Kopylow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Botho Maximilian SchneiderClinic and Polyclinic for Dermatology and Venerology, Andrological Section, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Hande Irem Hamurcu
Andrea Salzbrunn
Kathrein von Kopylow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAs prepubertal boys do not yet produce spermatozoa, they cannot rely on sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation before gonadotoxic therapy, such as high-dose alkylating agents or radiotherapy in the case of childhood cancers. According to the current guidelines, cryopreservation of testicular biopsies containing spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) may be proposed to high-risk patients for potential later therapeutic use to fulfill the patients' wish for a biological child. One promising technique for human in vitro spermatogenesis and in vitro propagation of human SSCs is microfluidic (MF) culture, in which cells or tissues are subjected to a continuous flow of medium. This provides exact control over such parameters as nutrient content and gradients, as well as the removal of waste metabolites. While MF has been shown to maintain tissues and cell populations of organs for longer than conventional in vitro culture techniques, it has not been widely used for testicular in vitro culture. MF could advance human testicular in vitro culture and is also applicable to reprotoxicity studies. This review summarizes the findings and achievements of testis-on-chip (ToC) setups to date and discusses the benefits and limitations of these for spermatogenesis in vitro and toxicity assessment.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsSpermatogenesisTestisAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCryopreservationHumansMalemicrofluidicsreprotoxicityspermatogonial stem cellstestistestis-on-chip

Identifiers

PMID40260644
PMCPMC12637881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.