ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does quantitative susceptibility mapping elucidate age-related alterations in deep gray matter iron deposition? A systematic review.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Susceptibility-Based MRI in Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: From Venous Drainage to Physiological Biomarkers-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Detecting Beta-Amyloid Plaque via Low Rank Based Orthogonal Projection and Spatial-Spectrum Detector Using High-Resolution Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Preclinical Studies.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of quantitative susceptibility mapping in assessing brain iron deposition in hemodialysis patients.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Voxel-Wise Whole-Brain Analysis in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: A Narrative Review.Human brain mapping · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: connecting pathophysiology with neuroimaging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of processing and analysis methodology on thalamic susceptibility assessment in multiple sclerosis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Thalamic iron in multiple sclerosis: Waning support for the early-rise late-decline hypothesis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an advanced MRI technique for assessing iron, calcium, and myelin tissue levels based on magnetic susceptibility. QSM consists of multiple processing steps, with various choices for each step. While QSM is increasingly applied in neurodegenerative disease research, its reproducibility and sensitivity in detecting susceptibility changes across groups or over time, which underpin the interpretation of clinical outcomes, have not been thoroughly quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how choices in background field removal (BFR), dipole inversion algorithms, and anatomical referencing impact the detection of changes in deep gray matter susceptibility. We used aging-related changes in brain iron, established in earlier foundational studies, as a surrogate model to test the sensitivity and reproducibility of 378 different QSM pipelines toward the detection of longitudinal susceptibility changes in a clinical setting. We used 10-year follow-up data and scan-rescan data of healthy adults scanned at 3T. Our results demonstrated high variability in the sensitivity of QSM pipelines toward detecting susceptibility changes. While most pipelines detected the same over-time changes, the choice of the BFR algorithm and the referencing strategy influenced reproducibility error and sensitivity substantially. Notably, pipelines using RESHARP with AMP-PE, HEIDI, or LSQR inversion showed the highest overall sensitivity. The findings suggest a strong impact of algorithmic choices in QSM processing on the ability to detect physiological changes in the brain. Careful consideration should be given to the pipeline configuration for reliable clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.