Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260837›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B.

Jing Wu, Shitong Xie, Yanfang Ma, Xiaoning He, Xinyue Dong, Qianling Shi, Qi Wang, Meixuan Li, Naijuan Yao, Liang Yao

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jing WuSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Shitong XieSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yanfang MaChinese EQUATOR Centre, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Xiaoning HeSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xinyue DongSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Qianling ShiThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Meixuan LiEvidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Naijuan YaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Liang YaoLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleChronic hepatitis B is a major worldwide public health concern. Entecavir, one nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral therapy option, is recommended as the first-line drug for chronic hepatitis B in many clinical guidelines. However, none of the guideline recommendations are based on the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis, where entecavir versus no treatment or placebo are compared directly.

objectivesTo evaluate the benefits and harms of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo in children and adults with chronic hepatitis B, who are either hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive or HBeAg-negative. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, three other databases, online trial registries, and reference lists, and contacted authors. The latest search was on 19 July 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials comparing entecavir versus no treatment or placebo in children or adults, or both, with chronic hepatitis B, and irrespective of treatment history with other antiviral drugs and other viral co-infections. We allowed co-interventions when administered equally to all intervention groups. OUTCOMES: The outcomes reported in this abstract and in the summary of findings table are all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life, and proportion of people with serious adverse events at the longest follow-up. RISK OF BIAS: We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias in the included trials. SYNTHESIS

methodsWe used a random-effects model to meta-analyse outcome results, where possible, and presented the results as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Where there was considerable heterogeneity, we performed a narrative analysis. We used a fixed-effect model for sensitivity analysis. We used GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 22 randomised clinical trials (published from 2005 to 2022) with 2940 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B. All trials had a parallel-group design. The experimental intervention was oral entecavir, with a follow-up duration of 5 weeks to 228 weeks. The comparator in 12 trials was no treatment, and in 10 trials was placebo. Fourteen trials equally administered co-interventions to the trial participants in the entecavir and no treatment and placebo groups. One trial included participants between 14 years and 55 years of age, one trial included only children, 19 trials included only adults, and one trial did not provide the age of participants. SYNTHESIS OF

resultsTwenty trials contributed data to the quantitative analysis. Ten trials (1379 participants) reported all-cause mortality with a mean follow-up duration of 48.9 weeks (range 5 to 100 weeks). The result was not estimable because no deaths occurred in any of the entecavir and no treatment or placebo groups. None of the trials provided data on health-related quality of life. We are very uncertain about the effect of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo on the proportion of people with serious adverse events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.32; absolute risk difference 22 fewer per 1000 (from 44 fewer to 21 more); 15 trials, 1676 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The mean follow-up duration was 58.4 weeks (range 5 weeks to 228 weeks). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for these outcomes to very low, mainly because the overall risk of bias in most trials was with some concerns or high, and serious imprecision (no events or few events). AUTHORS'

conclusionsGiven the issues of risk of bias and insufficient power of the included trials and the very low certainty of the available evidence, we could not determine the effect of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo on critical outcomes such as all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. There is a lack of data on health-related quality of life. Given the first-line recommendation and wide usage of entecavir in people with chronic hepatitis B, further evidence on clinically important outcomes, analysed in this review, is needed.

fundingThis Cochrane review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Registration: Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B, CD015536 via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD015536.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsGuanineHepatitis B, ChronicAdolescentAdultBiasCause of DeathChildHepatitis B e AntigensHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntiviral AgentsentecavirGuanineHepatitis B e Antigens

Identifiers

PMID40260837
PMCPMC12012880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.