ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Telemedicine Booths for Screening Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Prospective Multicenter Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension often remain undetected and untreated. This was particularly problematic during the COVID-19 pandemic when there were fewer in-person medical consultations. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether health screening using a telemedicine booth would have an impact on people's medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Health screening was run using a telemedicine booth (the consult station) that was placed in three different vaccination centers in northern France between July 2021 and September 2021. Participants followed a series of instructions to obtain various measures, including their blood pressure, BMI, and heart rate. If any measures were found to be outside of the normal range, participants were advised to consult a doctor. After 3 months, the participants with abnormal readings were contacted by telephone and were asked a series of standardized questions. The primary outcome was the percentage of respondents who reported that they had consulted a doctor since the health check. Results: Approximately 6000 people attended the 3 vaccination centers over the study period. Of these, around 2500 used the consult station. A total of 1333 participants (53.3%) were found to have abnormal readings, which mostly concerned their blood pressure, heart rate, or BMI. There were 638 participants who responded to the follow-up call, and 234 of these (37%) reported that they had consulted a doctor since the health check. However, 158 of the 638 respondents (24.8%) reported that they would have consulted a doctor even without the screening. Conclusions: We succeeded in screening large numbers of people for cardiovascular risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic by using a telemedicine booth. Although relatively few follow-up call respondents reported that they went on to consult a physician, the screening would nevertheless have raised people's awareness of their cardiovascular risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.