ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025
Profiling electric signals of electrogenic probiotic bacteria using self-attention analysis.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanomaterials as electrochemical regulators of bacterial biofilms through the modulation of extracellular electron transport and ion channels.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We fabricated a self-assembled electric circuit to detect the electrical signals produced by two electrogenic probiotic bacteria [Leuconostoc mesenteroides (L. mesenteroides) and Lactococcus lactis (L. lactis)] on chicken egg chorioallantoic membranes as well as in the intestine lumen of mice. Inoculation of L. mesenteroides or L. lactis plus glucose onto a ferrozine assay triggered the reduction of ferric ions to ferrous ions and the formation of ferrozine complexes, indicating the bacterial electron production. In the presence of glucose, L. lactis yielded higher electricity, measured by voltage changes, than L. mesenteroides in vitro. The spectra of the electrical signals generated by these two probiotic bacteria were highly distinguishable. We evaluated the importance of these differences with the application of a self-attention mechanism, a deep learning-based module, revealing several unique signals in the electrical spectra of L. mesenteroides as well as L. lactis bacteria. The specific electrical spectrum for each probiotic bacterium provided a dynamic signature for evaluation of the efficacy of various therapies using probiotics, antibiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation in the future. KEY POINTS: • The electrical signals produced by probiotic bacteria L. mesenteroides and L. lactis on chicken egg chorioallantoic membranes and in the mouse intestine lumen were detectable. • In the presence of glucose, L. lactis yielded higher electricity than L. mesenteroides in vitro. Furthermore, the electrical spectra generated by these two bacteria were different. • The importance of these differences with the application of a self-attention mechanism revealed several unique signals in the electrical spectra.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.