ArticleScientific reports2025
Frailty identification using a sensor-based upper-extremity function test: a deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarker integration and biosensor technologies enabling AI-driven insights into biological aging.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global increase in the older adult population highlights the need for effective frailty assessment, a condition linked to adverse health outcomes such as hospitalization and mortality. Existing frailty assessment tools, like the Fried phenotype and Rockwood score, have practical limitations, necessitating a more efficient approach. This study aims to enhance frailty prediction accuracy in older adults using a combined biomechanical and deep learning approach. We recruited 312 participants (126 non-frail, 145 pre-frail, 41 frail) and assessed frailty using the Fried index, upper-extremity function (UEF) test, and muscle force calculations. Machine learning (ML) models, including logistic regression and support vector machine (SVM), were employed alongside deep learning with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Results showed that incorporating muscle model parameters significantly improved frailty prediction. The LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy (74%), outperforming SVM (67%) and regression (66%), with precision and F1 scores of 81% and 75%, respectively. Notably, muscle co-contraction emerged as a critical predictor, with frail individuals exhibiting substantially higher levels. Our findings demonstrate that integrating UEF tasks with deep learning models provides superior frailty prediction, potentially offering a robust, efficient clinical tool. However, further validation with larger, more diverse populations is needed to confirm the generalizability of our results. This study underscores the potential of advanced computational techniques to improve the identification and monitoring of frailty in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.