Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263712›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2025

Advancing RNA phage biology through meta-omics.

Jens Hör

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial and human exonucleases mediate interkingdom antiviral immunity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jens HörHelmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Würzburg 97080, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3052-4430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages with RNA genomes are among the simplest biological entities on Earth. Since their discovery in the 1960s, they have been used as important models to understand the principal processes of life, including translation and the genetic code. While RNA phages were generally thought of as rare oddities in nature, meta-omics methods are rapidly changing this simplistic view by studying diverse biomes with unprecedented resolution. Metatranscriptomics dramatically expanded the number of known RNA phages from tens to tens of thousands, revealed their widespread abundance, and discovered several new families of potential RNA phages with largely unknown hosts, biology, and environmental impact. At the same time, (meta)genomic analyses of bacterial hosts are discovering an arsenal of defense systems bacteria employ to protect themselves from predation, whose functions in immunity against RNA phages we are only beginning to understand. Here, I review how meta-omics approaches are advancing the field of RNA phage biology with a focus on the discovery of new RNA phages and how bacteria might fight them.

Indexed as

BacteriaGenomicsMetagenomicsRNA PhagesBacteriophagesGenome, ViralTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID40263712
PMCPMC12014289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.