Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266248›Full record

ArticlePublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)

Evaluation of the Peer-Supported E-Health Module Implemented for University Students to Develop Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors.

Ayla Hendekci, Fatma Koç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayla HendekciFaculty of Health Sciences Public Health Nursing Department, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7974-6232
Fatma KoçMedicana Hospital, Samsun, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0003-0113-6049

Funding

TUBITAK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the peer-supported e-health module implemented for university students to gain healthy lifestyle behaviors.

designThe study was planned in a quasi-experimental research design. The study participants were 81 university students. The peer-supported e-health module was applied to all students in the sample. The "Introductory Information Form," "Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II," and "Peer Mentoring Assessing Scale" were used as data collection instruments. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.00. Descriptive statistics, percentage and frequency distributions, the one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and Wilks' Lambda test were used in the study.

resultsOf the students who participated in the study, 91.4% had not received training similar to the e-health module, and 82.7% had not received peer-supported training previously. The total scores of the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II were 127.06 ± 18.48 at the pre-test and 149.69 ± 20.85 at the post-test, and there was a significant difference between the scores (p < 0.001). The e-health module increased students' scores by 56.7% with a significant and greater effect (η

conclusionsIt was observed that the peer supported e-health module supported students' healthy lifestyle behaviors and was an effective module. To raise awareness about sustainable health approaches, it is recommended to increase similar training programs in which students are more involved in the process.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionHealthy LifestylePeer GroupStudentsAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineUniversitiesYoung Adulte‐healthhealthy lifestylenursingpeer supportuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID40266248
PMCPMC12210790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.