ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction to evaluate lumbar spinal stenosis status on magnetic resonance myelography.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Musculoskeletal Radiology: Bridging Innovation and Clinical Application.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: evaluation with super resolution deep learning reconstruction : Research.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) of MR myelography-aided evaluations of lumbar spinal stenosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, lumbar MR myelography of 40 patients (16 males and 24 females; mean age, 59.4 ± 31.8 years) were analyzed. Using the MR imaging data, MR myelography was separately reconstructed via SR-DLR, deep learning reconstruction (DLR), and conventional zero-filling interpolation (ZIP). Three radiologists, blinded to patient background data and MR reconstruction information, independently evaluated the image sets in terms of the following items: the numbers of levels affected by lumbar spinal stenosis; and cauda equina depiction, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall image quality.
resultsThe median interobserver agreement in terms of the numbers of lumbar spinal stenosis levels were 0.819, 0.735, and 0.729 for SR-DLR, DLR, and ZIP images, respectively. The imaging quality of the cauda equina, and image sharpness, noise, and overall quality on SR-DLR images were significantly better than those on DLR and ZIP images, as rated by all readers (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No significant differences were observed for artifacts on SR-DLR against DLR and ZIP.
conclusionsSR-DLR improved the image quality of lumbar MR myelographs compared to DLR and ZIP, and was associated with better interobserver agreement during assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.