Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266911›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Investigating Stress and Coping Behaviors in African Green Monkeys (

Brittany Roman, Christa Gallagher, Amy Beierschmitt, Sarah Hooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany RomanCenter for Conservation Medicine and Ecosystem Health, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre KN 0101, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
Christa GallagherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre KN 0101, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
Amy BeierschmittDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre KN 0101, Saint Kitts and Nevis.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-9999
Sarah HooperDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre KN 0101, Saint Kitts and Nevis.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-2500

Funding

ross university school of veterinary medicine 43003-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating behavioral and physiological assessment is critical to improve our ability to assess animal welfare in biomedical settings. Hair, blood, and saliva samples were collected from 40 recently acquired male African green monkeys (AGMs) to analyze concentrations of hair cortisol, plasma β-endorphin, and lysozyme alongside focal behavioral observations. The statistical methodology utilized machine learning and multivariate generalized linear mixed models to find associations between behaviors and fluctuations of cortisol, lysozyme, and β-endorphin concentrations. The study population was divided into two groups to assess the effectiveness of an enrichment intervention, though the hair cortisol results revealed no difference between the groups. The principal component analysis (PCA) with a Bayesian mixed model analysis reveals several significant patterns in specific behaviors and physiological responses, highlighting the need for further research to deepen our understanding of how behaviors correlate with animal welfare. This study's methodology demonstrates a more refined approach to interpreting these behaviors that can help improve animal welfare and inform the development of better management practices.

Indexed as

3RsAfrican green monkeyanimal welfarebehaviorcortisollysozymemachine learningmultivariate generalized linear mixed modelsrefinementstress responseβ-endorphin

Identifiers

PMID40266911
PMCPMC11946624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.