Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sorption and release of small molecules in PDMS and COC for Organs on chip.

Karlis Grindulis, Nikola Gabriela Matusevica, Vendija Kozlova, Roberts Rimsa, Kristaps Klavins, Gatis Mozolevskis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karlis GrindulisCellbox Labs, Riga, 1063, Latvia.
Nikola Gabriela MatusevicaInstitute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.
Vendija KozlovaInstitute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia, Riga, 1063, Latvia.
Roberts RimsaCellbox Labs, Riga, 1063, Latvia. roberts.rimsa@cellboxlabs.com.
Kristaps KlavinsInstitute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.
Gatis MozolevskisCellbox Labs, Riga, 1063, Latvia.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Grant agreement No. 739508, project CAMART2.Latvijas Zinātnes Padome VPP-EM-FOTONIKA-2022/1-0001 Smart Materials, Photonics, Technologies, and Engineering Ecosystems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate risk assessment in drug development is crucial, as conventional in vitro and in vivo models often fail to predict human-specific responses. Organs on chips offer a promising alternative, but widespread use of polydimethylsiloxane introduces challenges due to its sorption of small lipophilic molecules, distorting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. Cyclic olefin copolymer, a chemically stable alternative with minimal sorption, has emerged as a potential solution. This study investigates the sorption behavior of seven pharmaceutically active compounds in microfluidic devices and washout of these compounds, using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to evaluate recovery of compounds. Lipophilic molecules exhibited substantial sorption in polydimethylsiloxane and lower retention in cyclic olefin copolymer. Imipramine (logP = 4.80) decreased from 100 µM to 0.0384 µM for polydimethylsiloxane and 31.5 µM for cyclic olefin copolymer after 24 h incubation. Sorption was governed by multiple factors - lipophilicity and rotatable bond count were critical for both materials, hydrogen bond acceptors and molecular weight played a larger role in cyclic olefin copolymer, whereas topological polar surface area was critical for polydimethylsiloxane. Washout studies revealed that polydimethylsiloxane retains lipophilic compounds through bulk absorption, causing slow release, while cyclic olefin copolymer facilitated easier desorption. The cumulative sum of the first 5 h washout of loperamide (logP = 5.13) is 37.8% for polydimethylsiloxane and 71.5% for cyclic olefin copolymer. These findings highlight the importance of material selection and molecular properties in minimizing sorption and ensuring reliable experimental outcomes especially in microfluidic systems with distinctly different surface to volume ratios to other models.

Indexed as

DimethylpolysiloxanesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAdsorptionChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansMicrophysiological SystemsbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanes

Identifiers

PMID40269045
PMCPMC12018915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.