ArticleScientific reports2025
A low-power approach to optical glucose sensing via polarisation switching.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Biosensors-Principles of Operation and Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Design of a microwave sensor for non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose level with high sensitivity using electromagnetic properties.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-precision polarimetry is crucial for sensing and imaging applications, particularly for glucose monitoring within the physiological range of 50 to 400 mg/dl. Traditional approaches often rely on polarisation modulation using magneto-optic or liquid crystal modulators, which require high voltages or currents, limiting their practicality for wearable or implantable devices. In this work, we propose a polarisation-switching technique that alternates between two discrete polarisation states, offering a low-power alternative with miniaturisation potential. Using this method, we achieved a Mean Absolute Relative Difference of 7.7% and a Standard Error of Prediction of 9.6 mg/dl across the physiological glucose range, comparable to commercial continuous glucose monitors. Our approach demonstrates a limit of detection of approximately 40 mg/dl, with measurements performed in phosphate-buffered saline spiked with glucose. This work establishes polarisation switching as a viable alternative for glucose sensing, providing a foundation for future development of wearable and implantable glucose monitoring systems. By eliminating power-intensive components, our approach addresses key limitations of traditional polarimetric methods, paving the way for more accessible and energy-efficient diabetes management technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.