ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Prediction model and scoring system for the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) imposes a substantial disease burden on public healthcare, making it a significant health concern in the current era. However, there is currently a lack of risk assessment tools for AF recurrence in patients with AF and OSAS. Therefore, this study aims to explore the factors influencing AF recurrence in patients with AF and OSAS, and to establish a predictive model and scoring system for AF recurrence rates.
methodsThe study included a total of 423 patients with AF and OSAS, who were randomly divided into train set (n = 296) and test set (n = 127) in a ratio of 7:3. Afterwards, the train set was split into a recurrence group and a non-recurrence group for further analysis of indicators while in hospital.
resultsFollowing Lasso regression screening, 8 variables were selected from a pool of 62 variables from patients with AF and OSAS. Additionally, the study incorporated the CHA
conclusionThe predictive models and scoring systems developed in this study demonstrate good predictive ability in assessing the recurrence of AF in patients with OSAS, offering invaluable clinical guidance and references. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.