ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Virtual reality-enhanced rehabilitation for improving musculoskeletal function and recovery after trauma.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Robotic Systems with Dynamic Body Weight Support in Post-Traumatic Lower Limb Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of the computer-assisted rehabilitation environment on patient rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Bicolumnar Stabilization of Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Injuries: A Prospective Study of Combined Buttress Plate and Titanium Elastic Nail Fixation.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Immersive virtual reality for functional hand and finger rehabilitation: results from a randomized controlled trial in 150 patients after traumatic hand injuries.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Co-Designing an Inclusive Stakeholder Engagement Strategy for Rehabilitation Technology Training Using the I-STEM Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- The Effects of Virtual Reality Interventions on Motor Function Rehabilitation in Lower-Limb Amputees: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An Accessible AI-Assisted Rehabilitation System for Guided Upper Limb Therapy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating Radiogenomics and Machine Learning in Musculoskeletal Oncology Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Machine Learning for Precision Diagnostics and Surgical Interventions in Interconnected Musculoskeletal and Visual Systems.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Long-Term Refined Paraspinal Muscle Exercises Combined with ERAS Protocol Enhance Postoperative Recovery Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopedic trauma remains a critical challenge in modern healthcare, often resulting in severe mobility limitations, acute pain, and delayed recovery. Conventional rehabilitation techniques, though effective, fail to address the individualized, high-precision interventions needed for musculoskeletal injuries like fractures, joint instability, ligament tears, and muscular atrophy. Virtual reality (VR) technologies, such as Apple Vision Pro and HTC Vive Pro, offer a transformative approach by enhancing diagnostic precision, rehabilitation effectiveness, and patient engagement through interactive, immersive environments that improve clinical outcomes. These VR technologies provide real-time biomechanical data, such as joint mechanics, muscle coordination, and movement patterns, allowing clinicians to design personalized rehabilitation programs. These technologies can thus facilitate neuromuscular re-education, improve muscle proprioception, and enhance muscle coordination. Studies have shown that VR-based rehabilitation advances functional recovery, improves pain management, and reduces psychological barriers associated with immobility. VR also facilitates telemedicine, increasing accessibility for patients with geographic or mobility issues. However, while VR may provide biomechanical data, it is important to note that they fall short in accurate motion tracking, particularly in fine motor control tasks. This scoping review follows PRISMA guidelines to explore the potential of VR in orthopedic rehabilitation, analyzing its diagnostic capabilities, personalized interventions, and real-time feedback systems. Despite this, barriers remain, including regulatory challenges, limitations in haptic feedback, high cost, and patient compliance. By presenting a balanced perspective on the landscape of VR in orthopedic care, this paper emphasizes the need for rigorous clinical validation, regulatory advancements, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Ultimately, VR offers the potential to significantly improve recovery outcomes, enhance patient engagement, and streamline rehabilitation protocols, but its successful integration into clinical practice must be approached with both optimism and caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.