Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270029›Full record

SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025

Employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases: a systematic literature review.

Nicolas Bougas, Terhi Kangas, Katrien Vanthomme, Jose Joaquín Mira Solves, Gaël Brulé, Helene Mellerio, Hadewijch Vandenheede, Agnes Dumas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolas Bougas *Université Paris Cité, Inserm, ECEVE, UMR 1123, 10 Avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-1724
Terhi Kangas *Department of Sociology, BRISPO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7936-9155
Katrien VanthommeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-3852
Jose Joaquín Mira SolvesAlicante-Sant Joan Healthcare District, FISABIO, Alicante (Spain), Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-083X
Gaël BruléGeneva School of Health Sciences, 47 Avenue de Champel, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4560-8696
Helene MellerioUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, ECEVE, UMR 1123, 10 Avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-8677
Hadewijch VandenheedeDepartment of Sociology, BRISPO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-8155
Agnes DumasINSERM, Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de La Santé & Traitement de L'Information Médicale, Equipe CALIPSO, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France. agnes.dumas@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-6952

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme EJP RD COFUND-EJP N° 825575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe socioeconomic impact of rare diseases has been mostly studied at the macrolevel, but evidence at the microlevel is lacking, which overshadows health-related social inequalities affecting people with rare diseases, namely, health selection effects.

aimThis study presents an overview of employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases, two factors related to health selection effects.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched from 2013 to 2023. Eligible studies needed to investigate at least one work-related outcome measuring employment or work ability in individuals living with rare diseases and to compare it with a control group. Indeed, including only studies with matched or standardized control groups is essential for ensuring the reliability and validity of research findings.

resultsOf the 7,694 abstracts identified, 44 studies, including 34 rare diseases, met the inclusion criteria. Administrative databases were used to collect work-related data in 48% of the studies, and 73% of the studies employed matching methods for comparison. Overall, 52% of the studies focused solely on employment, 14% focused solely on work ability and 34% included both categories. Individuals with rare diseases were less likely to be employed or more likely to be unemployed than controls in 68% of the studies and 87% of the studies reported that individuals with rare diseases were more likely to be work disabled. Regarding work ability, 90% of the studies reported more missed work time in cases than in controls, and more perceived impairment at work was found in 100% of the studies. DISCUSSION/

conclusionThese results show that individuals with rare diseases tend to have poor work outcomes, but methodological limitations hamper the understanding of health selection effects. Implications for future research and policy-making are discussed.

Indexed as

EmploymentRare DiseasesHumansAbsenteeismEmploymentPresenteeismQuality of lifeRare diseasesWork

Identifiers

PMID40270029
PMCPMC12020228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.