Trial reportThe British journal of nutrition2025
Effects of dietary FODMAP content on the faecal microbiome and gastrointestinal physiology in healthy adults: a randomised, controlled cross-over feeding study.
Trial report in The British journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of gut microbiota research in functional bowel disorders from 2016 to 2025.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- IBS and SIBO: Gut Microbiota, Pathophysiology, and Non-Pharmacological Interventions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of FODMAPs in Sports Nutrition: A Narrative Review and Clinical Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of dietary FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di- and mono-saccharides and polyols) in healthy adults is poorly documented. This study compared the specific effects of low and moderate FODMAP intake (relative to typical intake) on the faecal microbiome, participant-reported outcomes and gastrointestinal physiology. In a single-blind cross-over study, twenty-five healthy participants were randomised to one of two provided diets, 'low' (LFD) <4 g/d or 'moderate' (MFD) 14-18 g/d, for 3 weeks each, with ≥ 2-week washout between. Endpoints were assessed in the last week of each diet. The faecal bacterial/archaeal and fungal communities were characterised by eighteen participants from whom high-quality DNA was extracted by 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) profiling and metagenomic sequencing. There were no differences in gastrointestinal or behavioural symptoms (fatigue, depression, anxiety) or faecal characteristics and biochemistry (including SCFA). Mean colonic transit time (telemetry) was 23 (95 % CI: 15, 30) h with the MFD compared with 34 (24, 44) h with LFD (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.