ReviewBritish journal of haematology2025
How we manage immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura after rituximab failure or intolerance.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Daratumumab in relapse-refractory immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: additional evidence for its efficacy.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Update in treatment options for congenital and immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Evidence for the use of anti-CD20 therapeutic antibodies in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura management: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Tailored treatment of acute immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Anti-ADAMTS13 Antibodies Trajectory is Associated With ADAMTS13 Recovery in Immune-Mediated TTP.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- How we manage immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura after rituximab failure or intolerance.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of rituximab, a B-cell-depleting agent as a pre-emptive treatment in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), is the current standard of care. However, for patients refractory to rituximab or for those with contraindications, further treatment guidelines are scarce. Standard immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents were used routinely in the past, but most of the data proving their efficacy are stemming from experience before the routine use of rituximab. Ciclosporin A and azathioprine seem to be effective in the pre-emptive setting, but their safety profile might limit their use. Extended or intensive rituximab administration may overcome refractoriness in some patients. New therapeutic options, such as new generation anti-CD20 antibodies like obinutuzumab or the plasma cell-directed therapy daratumumab, showed important efficacy in iTTP after rituximab failure, with a favourable safety profile. There are no available comparative studies for pre-emptive treatment options in iTTP; therefore, data from large databases and multicentre studies are essential. In this review, we summarize the possible treatment options in case of rituximab failure in iTTP and try to provide a recommendation based on available literature and our own experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.