Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270622›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

The Prevalence of Corneal Sensitivity Loss in Patients with and without Dry Eye Disease.

Matthew Stolz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew StolzClemson Eye, Greenville, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of corneal sensitivity loss in consecutive patients presenting to the clinic as well as in those patients with and without dry eye disease (DED). Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of consecutive patients who presented to the eye clinic and underwent corneal sensitivity testing using a non-contact esthesiometer. Data included demographics, medical history, prior or current treatments, comorbidities, corneal sensitivity measurements, dry eye symptoms (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire [SPEED] questionnaire), and corneal staining scores (Oxford scale). The primary outcome was the prevalence of corneal sensitivity loss, defined as ≥8 mbar. Secondary outcome measures included the prevalence of corneal sensitivity loss in eyes with DED (Oxford ≥2 and SPEED ≥5) and without DED (Oxford ≤1 and SPEED <5). Results: A total of 395 eyes of 198 patients were included for analysis. Average age was 67.7 ± 16.0 years, and the majority of patients (60.6%) were female. Corneal sensitivity loss was observed in 9.4% of all eyes, and 12.6% of patients had reduced corneal sensitivity in at least one eye. When assessing eyes with signs of DED (Oxford ≥2), 19.7% (13/66) had corneal sensitivity loss. This prevalence increased to 31.4% (11/35) in eyes with both signs and symptoms of DED. Conversely, the prevalence was 5.5% (12/219) in eyes without DED. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that Oxford staining score was the strongest predictor of reduced corneal sensitivity (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3-3.0, p=0.001), with other significant factors including history of DED, stroke, and herpes zoster virus. Conclusion: Reduced corneal sensation, a sign of corneal nerve damage and precursor to neurotrophic keratitis, affects nearly 10% of all eyes and 30% of eyes with signs and symptoms of DED. Routine clinical testing of corneal sensation should be implemented, particularly in patients with DED, to ensure early diagnosis and prompt treatment to prevent disease progression.

Indexed as

corneal nervescorneal sensationcorneal sensitivitydry eyeesthesiometerneurotrophic keratitis

Identifiers

PMID40270622
PMCPMC12015737

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.