ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
Postural stability and fall risk in systemic sclerosis patients.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to objectively assess the fall risk and postural balance status of systemic sclerosis (SS) patients and investigate its association with various clinical findings. Patients and methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2020 and September 2020. The study included 14 patients (12 females, 2 males; mean age: 48.4±12.3 years; range, 21 to 63 years) diagnosed with SS and a control group of 20 healthy volunteers (17 females, 3 males; mean age: 46.8±9.0 years; range, 25 to 60 years). Demographic and clinical data of the participants were noted. Results of anti-nuclear antibodies and anti-Scl-70 antibodies were recorded. The fall index, indicating fall risk, was determined using a posturography device, and postural stability measurements were performed. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International was used to evaluate fall activity. The modified Rodnan skin score was used to assess the degree of cutaneous involvement in SS. Results: Fall index results were higher in the SS group (p<0.05). The rate of falls in the past year among SS patients was 7.1%. The SS group showed deviations from the normal population in the postural measurement when eyes closed on a solid surface in normal position with the stability index, eyes closed on a pillow with the stability index, and eyes closed on a solid surface with the head tilted 30° forward with the weight distribution index (p<0.05). Fear of falling scores were higher in diffuse-type SS compared to limited-type SS (p<0.01). No differences were observed in other parameters. Conclusion: This study revealed impaired postural balance and increased fall risk in SS patients compared to the normal population. Evaluation of postural balance and fall risk in SS patients should be done in the early period, and necessary treatments should be applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.