Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271721›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025

Comprehensive review of sweetpotato flavor compounds: Opportunities for developing consumer-preferred varieties.

Modesta Abugu, Matthew Allan, Suzanne Johanningsmeier, Massimo Iorizzo, G Craig Yencho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine-learning-assisted screening of key flavor compounds in pumpkins.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Modesta AbuguDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7702-2054
Matthew AllanFood Science and Market Quality & Handling Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9661-4362
Suzanne JohanningsmeierFood Science and Market Quality & Handling Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-4666
Massimo IorizzoDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
G Craig YenchoDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Agricultural Biotechnology in Our Food Energy and Water Systems (AgBioFEWS)Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation via a subcontract with the International Potato Center, Lima, Peru under the RTB Breeding INV-041105Genetics and Genomics Scholars ProgramNational Science Foundation, National Research Traineeship Program 1828820Sweetpotato and Potato Breeding and Genetics Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NCUnited States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Food Science and Market Quality & Handling Research Unit in Raleigh, NC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flavor contributes significantly to consumer preferences of cooked sweetpotato. Sugars largely drive the sweet taste, while the volatile organic compounds (VOCs), mainly classified as alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, and terpenes, provide characteristic aromas and influence the overall perception of flavor. In this paper, we review sweetpotato VOCs identified in the literature from 1980 to 2024 and discuss the efforts to understand how these compounds influence sensory perception and consumer preferences. Over 400 VOCs have been identified in cooked sweetpotato with 76 known to be aroma-active. Most of these aroma-active compounds are generated from Maillard reactions, Strecker, lipid and carotenoid degradation, or thermal release of terpenes from glycosidic bonds during cooking. Suggested mechanisms of formation of these aroma-active compounds are described. However, specific VOCs that are responsible for different aromas and flavors in cooked sweetpotatoes are yet to be fully characterized. There are significant opportunities to further identify the key predictors of aroma and flavor attributes in sweetpotato, which can be used to enhance the quality of existing varieties and develop new ones using a wide range of genetic tools. This review summarizes 44 years of research aimed at identifying key aroma compounds in cooked sweetpotato and provides a roadmap for future studies to guide breeders in developing high-quality, consumer-preferred varieties.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsIpomoea batatasVolatile Organic CompoundsConsumer BehaviorCookingHumansOdorantsTasteFlavoring AgentsVolatile Organic CompoundsIpomoea batatasMaillard reactionsensory evaluationSweet potatovolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID40271721
PMCPMC12019920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.