ArticlemBio2025
A human-ACE2 knock-in mouse model for SARS-CoV-2 infection recapitulates respiratory disorders but avoids neurological disease associated with the transgenic K18-hACE2 model.
Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploring coronavirus cell entry with functional viromics.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- A biosafe mouse model for SARS-CoV-2 infection that more realistically simulates COVID-19 symptoms.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress in Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and COVID-19: Microglia-Neutrophil Interaction.ACS omega · 2026Review
- From HIV to SARS-CoV-2 associated neurological disorder ("HAND" to "SAND"): Viral infection as a "time-bomb" for the aging brain.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
- SARS-CoV-2 variants: biology, pathogenicity, immunity and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Current Advances and Applications of Animal Models in SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis and Vaccine Development.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal models have been instrumental in elucidating the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and in testing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and therapeutics. Wild-type (WT) mice are not susceptible to many SARS-CoV-2 variants, and therefore, transgenic K18-hACE2 mice have emerged as a standard model system. However, this model is characterized by a severe disease, particularly associated with neuroinfection, which leads to early humane endpoint euthanasia. Here, we established a novel knock-in (KI) mouse model by inserting the original K18-hACE2 transgene into the collagen type I alpha chain (COL1A1) locus using a recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) system. Once the Col1a1-K18-hACE2 mouse colony was established, animals were challenged with a B.1 SARS-CoV-2 (D614G) isolate and were monitored for up to 14 days. Col1a1-K18-hACE2 mice exhibited an initial weight loss similar to the K18-hACE2 transgenic model but did not develop evident neurologic clinical signs. The majority of Col1a1-K18-hACE2 mice did not reach the pre-established humane endpoint, showing a progressive weight gain 9 days postinfection (dpi). Importantly, despite this apparent milder pathogenicity of the virus in this mouse model compared to the K18-hACE2 transgenic model, high levels of viral RNA were detected in the lungs, oropharyngeal swab, and nasal turbinates. Moreover, the remaining lesions and inflammation in the lungs were still observed 14 dpi. In contrast, although low-level viral RNA could be detected in a minority of Col1a1-K18-hACE2 animals, no brain lesions were observed at any timepoint. Overall, Col1a1-K18-hACE2 mice constitute a new model for investigating SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and treatments, with potential implications for studying long-term COVID-19 sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.