Evidence mapPaperPMID 40272271Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2025

The NIDDK Takes on the Complications of Type 1 Diabetes: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study.

Barbara H Braffett, Ionut Bebu, Gayle M Lorenzi, Catherine L Martin, Bruce A Perkins, Rose Gubitosi-Klug, David M Nathan, DCCT/EDIC Research Group

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara H BraffettBiostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-2184-9754
Ionut BebuBiostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-7968
Gayle M LorenziUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Catherine L MartinUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Bruce A PerkinsUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rose Gubitosi-KlugCase Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-6870
David M NathanDiabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
DCCT/EDIC Research Group

Funding

Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) StudyU01DK094157 · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$8.0M
Continuation of Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Biostatistics CenterU01DK094176 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ionut Bebu, Barbara Halina Braffett · 2022 to 2022
$4.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK114812NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094157NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) (1983-1993), intensive therapy aimed at near-normal glycemia was compared with conventional therapy in 1,441 adolescent and adult participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) over a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. The primary DCCT results, reported in 1993, demonstrated the benefits of intensive therapy (mean HbA1c ∼7%) compared with conventional therapy (HbA1c ∼9%) in reducing the risk of development and progression of microvascular complications by 35%-76%. HbA1c <7% was adopted worldwide as the therapeutic target for T1D. Subsequently, the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study (1994-present) was initiated as the observational follow-up of the DCCT cohort. EDIC has shown that the early beneficial effects of intensive versus conventional therapy on complications persisted for ∼10 years after the convergence of HbA1c levels in the two groups during EDIC-a novel concept termed "metabolic memory." During EDIC, prior intensive therapy was also shown to reduce the risk of severe microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease, mortality, and, recently, of age-related outcomes including cognitive impairment, bone loss, and reduced mobility. The DCCT/EDIC cohort is the most extensively studied T1D cohort in history. The participants have been followed and deeply phenotyped for 95% of their diabetes durations and 65% of their lifespans. Throughout its 40+ years, funded by and in close collaboration with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, DCCT/EDIC has generated results that have guided treatment priorities in T1D and led to improved survival and quality of life for millions of people with T1D worldwide.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentAdultFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U.S.)United StatesGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID40272271
PMCPMC12178619

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.