ReviewDiabetes care2025
The NIDDK Takes on the Complications of Type 1 Diabetes: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study.
Review in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between glycated hemoglobin variability and risk of diabetic kidney disease and diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of flash glucose monitoring versus capillary blood glucose monitoring on glycaemia in Indian youth with type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Trial
- Is MASLD an independent risk factor for micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes? A critical reappraisal and future directions.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Metabolic Reprogramming-Driven Cardiovascular Immune Damage: From Glyco-Lipotoxicity and Epigenetic Memory to Multidimensional Cross-Organ Communication Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An international consensus on screening and monitoring early-stage type 1 diabetes: A roadmap to European implementation.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
- Review
- Predictors of One-Year Renal Function Decline in Type 2 Diabetes: Implications for Metabolic Target Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Progress in research on the association between glucose metabolism disorders and intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy and emerging therapeutic strategies: a network-based perspective.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Review
- Transforming diabetes care: The effect of insulin pump technology on quality of life in adults with type 1 diabetes: An interview-based case-control study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Persistent Need for Ophthalmic Follow-Up After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Long-Term Effects on Diabetic Retinopathy and Quality of Life.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- NIDDK: Celebrating 75 Years of Advancing Diabetes Research.Diabetes · 2025Article
- NIDDK: Celebrating 75 Years of Advancing Diabetes Research.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- NIDDK at 75 Years of Age: Great Triumphs but Concerns for Its Longevity.Diabetes care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) (1983-1993), intensive therapy aimed at near-normal glycemia was compared with conventional therapy in 1,441 adolescent and adult participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) over a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. The primary DCCT results, reported in 1993, demonstrated the benefits of intensive therapy (mean HbA1c ∼7%) compared with conventional therapy (HbA1c ∼9%) in reducing the risk of development and progression of microvascular complications by 35%-76%. HbA1c <7% was adopted worldwide as the therapeutic target for T1D. Subsequently, the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study (1994-present) was initiated as the observational follow-up of the DCCT cohort. EDIC has shown that the early beneficial effects of intensive versus conventional therapy on complications persisted for ∼10 years after the convergence of HbA1c levels in the two groups during EDIC-a novel concept termed "metabolic memory." During EDIC, prior intensive therapy was also shown to reduce the risk of severe microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease, mortality, and, recently, of age-related outcomes including cognitive impairment, bone loss, and reduced mobility. The DCCT/EDIC cohort is the most extensively studied T1D cohort in history. The participants have been followed and deeply phenotyped for 95% of their diabetes durations and 65% of their lifespans. Throughout its 40+ years, funded by and in close collaboration with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, DCCT/EDIC has generated results that have guided treatment priorities in T1D and led to improved survival and quality of life for millions of people with T1D worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.