ArticleCurrent protocols2025
Label-Free Quantification of Protein Density in Living Cells.
Article in Current protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Label-Free Quantification of Protein Density in Living Cells.Current protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracellular water content, W, and protein concentration, P, are essential characteristics of living cells. Healthy cells maintain them within a narrow range, but often become dehydrated under severe stress; moreover, persistent loss of water (an increase in P) can lead to apoptotic death. It is very likely that protein concentration affects cellular metabolism and signaling through macromolecular crowding (MC) effects, to which P is directly related, but much remains unknown in this area. Obviously, in order to study the biological roles and regulation of MC in living cells, one needs a method to measure it. Simple and accurate measurements of P in adherent cells can be based on its relationship to refractive index. The latter can be derived from two or more (depending on the algorithm) mutually defocused brightfield images processed by the transport-of-intensity equation (TIE) that must be complemented by a determination of volume. Here, we describe the experimental considerations for both TIE imaging and for a particular method of cell volume measurement, transmission-through-dye (TTD). We also introduce an ImageJ plugin for solving TIE. TIE and TTD are fully compatible with each other as well as with fluorescence. A similar approach can be applied to subcellular organelles; however, in this case, the volume must be determined differently.© 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Sample preparation for TIE with or without TTD Basic Protocol 2: Acquisition of TIE and TTD images Basic Protocol 3: Calibration of TIE Basic Protocol 4: Measurement of the absorption coefficient of the medium used for TTD Basic Protocol 5: Image processing using Fiji Support Protocol 1: Installation and use of TIE plugin Support Protocol 2: Automation of the double TTD/TIE processing using a Fiji macro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.