ReviewCirculation research2025
Stellate Ganglia: A Key Therapeutic Target for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia in Heart Disease.
Review in Circulation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic Neutralization of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Attenuates Stellate Ganglion Neuroinflammation and Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Chronic Heart Failure in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Cardiac Sympathetic Neuromodulation in the Management of Refractory Electrical Storm: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal, device-based therapeutic targeting of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- The mechanism and clinical research of vagus nerve electrical stimulation in the treatment of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.iScience · 2026Review
- Glial cells in the heart: Implications for their roles in health and disease.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Impact of PKC-MAPK Signaling on Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Neural Regulation of Cardiac Arrhythmias: From the Brain-Heart Axis to Emerging Precision Therapies.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), such as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, are the cause of approximately half a million deaths per year in the United States, which is a common lethal event in heart disease, such as hypertension, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, long-QT syndrome, and progressing into advanced heart failure. A common characteristic of these heart diseases, and the subsequent development of VAs, is the overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system. Current treatments for VAs in these heart diseases, such as β-adrenergic receptor blockers and cardiac sympathetic ablation, aim at inhibiting cardiac sympathetic overactivation. However, these treatments do not translate into becoming efficacious as long-term suppressors of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation events. As a key regulatory component in the heart, cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons residing in the stellate ganglia (SGs) release neurotransmitters (such as norepinephrine and NPY [neuropeptide Y]) to perform their regulatory role in dictating cardiac function. Growing evidence from animal experiments and clinical studies has demonstrated that the remodeling of the SG may be intimately involved in malignant arrhythmogenesis. This identifies the SG as a key potential therapeutic target for the treatment of malignant VAs in heart disease. Therefore, this review summarizes the role of SG in ventricular arrhythmogenesis and updates the novel targeting of SG for clinical treatment of VAs in heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.