ArticleVaccine2025
Optimising human rabies vaccine supply chains: A modelling study.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies for provisioning rabies post-exposure vaccines.Vaccine · 2026Article
- Practitioner's perspectives on access to Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis in Tanzania: A mixed-methods and theoretically-informed study to inform policy and practice.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Towards "Zero by 30", the Kenyan case: a systematic exploration of barriers to rabies policy implementation through systems thinking.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Access to Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis in Tanzania: A mixed-methods and theoretically-informed study to inform policy and practise.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- High awareness, low compliance: rabies knowledge and dog ownership practices among pastoralists, Marsabit County, Kenya.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRabies causes thousands of deaths annually in low- and middle-income countries. Despite effective vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), their expense, coupled with supply chain failures, leads to stockouts and preventable deaths. Investment by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, aims to improve access to post-exposure vaccines. We evaluate PEP demand in Tanzania and Kenya and examine stock management strategies for improving supply chains in Gavi-eligible countries.
methodsWe fitted negative binomial distributions to five years of bite patient data from Tanzania (6646 patients, 20 districts) and Kenya (199,112 patients, 47 counties) to parameterise simulations of post-exposure vaccine demand under WHO-recommended intramuscular (IM) and intradermal (ID) regimens. We compared simulated vaccine use, stockouts, and the impact of stock management strategies across the observed range in demand.
resultsBite patient incidence varied dramatically; demand surges far exceeded monthly averages (in 6 % of months exceeding 3× average monthly bite patient presentations) and were most extreme in low-incidence settings. ID vaccination reduces vial use by >55 % and reduces stockout risk. Under ID vaccination vial savings are greatest in high-throughput settings, whilst risk mitigation is maximised in low-throughput settings. Decentralizing PEP to more facilities improves access, though reduces vial-sharing opportunities and so increases vial use. Resilient supply chain strategies were identified according to patient throughput, allowing for adaptation to changing demand.
conclusionsID vaccination reduces vial use and stockouts, even in low-throughput settings. Tailoring stock management-through adjusted alert thresholds and restocking volumes-can simplify the integration of rabies vaccines into essential immunisation supply chains, improving their availability and preventing unnecessary deaths. However, logistical trade-offs must also be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.