Evidence mapPaperPMID 40275017Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025

Dialysis and cognitive impairment.

Chris W McIntyre, Arsh Jain

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Blood Flow Restriction Training in Hemodialysis Patients: Clinical Benefits, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microbiota-gut-kidney axis in health and renal disease.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chris W McIntyreLilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. cmcint48@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-3135
Arsh JainLilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with chronic kidney disease who require maintenance dialysis characteristically experience accelerated and aggravated cognitive decline compared with those with advanced kidney disease who are not receiving this form of kidney replacement therapy. This effect is inadequately appreciated, but of crucial importance to patients, their carers and the health-care systems that support them. Although many of the comorbid conditions prevalent in this patient population have the potential to affect brain structure and function, an evolving body of evidence indicates that the dialysis therapy itself has a central role in the pathophysiology of progressive cognitive impairment. Both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with structural and functional changes in the brain that can lead to characteristic short-term symptoms, such as headache, confusion, delirium and brain fog, as well as long-term reductions in cognitive functional ability. Here, we explore the mechanisms, both established and putative, underlying these effects and consider approaches to addressing this issue with both single and complex therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.