ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
Advances in abiotic tissue-based biomaterials: A focus on decellularization and devitalization techniques.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydration as a governing state variable in the mechanical and electrical response of decellularized extracellular matrix materials.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Rolled amniotic membrane for practical vascular graft development: a scoping review.Human cell · 2026Article
- Advances in Decellularization of Fish Wastes for Extracellular Matrix Extraction in Sustainable Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Immunomodulatory role of decellularized extracellular matrix in skin wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Acellular Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine: Advances in Decellularization and Clinical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Review explores the growing and diversifying field of tissue-derived abiotic constructs for tissue engineering applications, with main focus on decellularization and devitalization techniques and principles. Acellular fractions derived from biological tissues, such as the extracellular matrix (ECM), have long been considered a valuable approach for the generation of numerous scaffolds and more complex constructs. The removal of the cellular content has been considered essential to prevent the development of adverse immunological reactions. Nevertheless, the discovery of promising features of certain cellular components has sparked interest in the use of inactivated or devitalized cellular fractions for several applications, particularly in regenerative medicine and inflammation control. Devitalization has been described for several clinical applications, but remains poorly explored in terms of in vitro constructs compared to decellularization methods currently available. In this review, we present and critically evaluate a spectrum of approaches for the decellularization of whole-organs and in vitro constructs, and the most prevalent devitalization techniques, with a discussion on their implications on scaffolds composition, structure, and potentially therapeutic properties. Processing methodologies to achieve optimal cell-based abiotic materials and approaches for their effective characterization are described and discussed. The application of these materials in healthcare, with most focus on regenerative approaches and including examples of commercially available products, is also addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.