ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
SLAYER: a computational framework for identifying synthetic lethal interactions through integrated analysis of cancer dependencies.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Autophagy to Overcome Chemoresistance and Immune Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Challenges and opportunities for oncology drug repurposing informed by synthetic lethality.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synthetic lethality represents a promising therapeutic approach in precision oncology, yet systematic identification of clinically relevant synthetic lethal interactions remains challenging. Here, we present SLAYER (Synthetic Lethality AnalYsis for Enhanced taRgeted therapy), a computational framework that integrates cancer genomic data and genome-wide CRISPR knockout screens to identify potential synthetic lethal interactions. SLAYER employs parallel analytical approaches examining both direct mutation-dependency associations and pathway-mediated relationships across 1080 cancer cell lines. Our integrative method identified 682 putative interactions, which were refined to 148 high-confidence candidates through stringent filtering for effect size, druggability, and clinical prevalence. Systematic validation against protein interaction databases revealed an ∼14-fold enrichment of known associations among SLAYER predictions compared with random gene pairs. Through pathway-level analysis, we identified inhibition of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) as potentially synthetically lethal with RB1 mutations in bladder cancer. Experimental studies demonstrated selective sensitivity to AhR inhibition in RB1-mutant versus wild-type bladder cancer cells, which probably operates through indirect pathway-mediated mechanisms rather than direct genetic interaction. In summary, by integrating mutation profiles, gene dependencies, and pathway relationships, our approach provides a resource for investigating genetic vulnerabilities across cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.