Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276595›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review of artificial intelligence approaches in differential diagnosis.

Serena Dattola, Augusto Ielo, Giuseppe Varone, Alberto Cacciola, Angelo Quartarone, Lilla Bonanno

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Serena DattolaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Augusto IeloIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe VaroneBrain Stimulation Mechanisms Laboratory, Division of Depression and Anxiety Disorders, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Alberto CacciolaBrain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Angelo QuartaroneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Lilla BonannoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes, leading to significant changes in personality, behavior, and language abilities. Early and accurate differential diagnosis between FTD, its subtypes, and other dementias, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), is crucial for appropriate treatment planning and patient care. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy by identifying complex patterns in clinical and neuroimaging data that are not easily discernible through conventional analysis. Methods: This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO, aimed to assess the strengths and limitations of current ML models used in differentiating FTD from other neurological disorders. A comprehensive literature search from 2013 to 2024 identified 25 eligible studies involving 6,544 patients with dementia, including 2,984 with FTD, 3,437 with AD, 103 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 20 Parkinson's disease dementia or probable dementia with Lewy bodies (PDD/DLBPD). Results: The review found that Support Vector Machines (SVMs) were the most frequently used ML technique, often applied to neuroimaging and electrophysiological data. Deep learning methods, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have also been increasingly adopted, demonstrating high accuracy in distinguishing FTD from other dementias. The integration of multimodal data, including neuroimaging, EEG signals, and neuropsychological assessments, has been suggested to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Discussion: ML techniques showed strong potential for improving FTD diagnosis, but challenges like small sample sizes, class imbalance, and lack of standardization limit generalizability. Future research should prioritize the development of standardized protocols, larger datasets, and explainable AI techniques to facilitate the integration of ML-based tools into real-world clinical practice. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024520902.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdifferential diagnosisfrontotemporal dementiamachine learningneuroimagingSupport Vector Machines

Identifiers

PMID40276595
PMCPMC12018464

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.