ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Assessing patterns of chronic kidney disease care in Australian primary care: a retrospective cohort study of a national general practice dataset.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a nurse-led chronic kidney disease clinic: a single-centre cohort study.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Prevalence of SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP1 receptor agonist prescriptions in type 2 diabetes patients with and without chronic kidney disease: Analysis of an Australian primary care dataset.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) monitoring and cardiovascular risk management are essential in reducing disease progression and cardiovascular events. This study aimed to understand CKD monitoring and management practices in Australian primary care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of adults who attended general practices participating in MedicineInsight between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2020 and met diagnostic criteria for CKD. Care quality was assessed in the 18-months following identification of CKD. Core monitoring was defined as at least one assessment of all the following measurements: blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR), lipid profile, and HbA1c in patients with diabetes. Cardiovascular risk management comprised medication prescription (ACEi/ARB and statin), blood pressure target achievement and LDL cholesterol <2 mmol/L. Modified Poisson regression models adjusted for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were used to identify patient factors associated with completion of monitoring and medication prescription. Findings: CKD was identified in 140,780 patients, of which 34.2% received core monitoring within 18 months of CKD identification. Measurement of the individual components of the core monitoring outcome varied: blood pressure (88.7%), eGFR (86.0%), UACR (41.1%), lipids (70.9%) and HbA1c (85.5%). ACEi/ARB were prescribed in 65.2% of the cohort and 54.4% were prescribed a statin. Blood pressure targets of <140/90 mmHg and <130/80 mmHg were achieved in 57.9% and 29.3% of patients, respectively. LDL target of <2 mmol/L was achieved in 38.8% of patients. Older age, comorbid diabetes and hypertension were associated with a greater likelihood of monitoring and medication prescription. Interpretation: In this large, population-based study, we observed substantial variation in CKD risk monitoring and the management of cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD. We identified several priority areas for CKD management in primary care including need for improvement in albuminuria monitoring. Funding: University of New South Wales Scientia Program and Boehringer Ingelheim Eli Lilly Alliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.