ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Cognitive therapies and their impact on neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, the impact of cognitive therapies on patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been studied in terms of cognition, quality of life and activities of daily living rather than in the context of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). The objective of this scoping review was to collect evidence that different cognitive therapies affect the NPS of patients with MCI and dementia. A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED, EMBASE, ISI WOS and SCOPUS databases through February 2025. After the elimination of duplicates, a total of 1,854 publications were identified. Among these, 42 articles were included in the analysis. These articles were reviewed by title and abstract, and then the full text was reviewed by two independent researchers with subsequent decisions about conflicts made in consultation with a third researcher. A sample of 4,089 participants was collected. All participants had undergone cognitive training interventions, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, art therapy, reminiscence therapy or psychobehavioural therapy and were evaluated for NPS. Depression was the most commonly analysed symptom (70% of the articles). The types of interventions that improved NPS the most were art therapy and reminiscence therapy (76 and 71% of the articles), whereas cognitive training (43%) was the least effective. While all types of therapy seemed to support the improvement of NPS, art therapy and reminiscence therapy were the most effective, especially for patients with MCI or dementia. However, studies that comprehensively evaluate the effects of cognitive therapy on NPS other than depression are lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.