Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276803›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

A systematic assessment of the demand for HTA hub services in Asia.

Julie Hoang, Jeffrey Sine, Sweta Saxena, Christian Suharlim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie HoangManagement Sciences for Health, Medford, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3069-3644
Jeffrey SineManagement Sciences for Health, Medford, MA, USA.
Sweta SaxenaUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Christian SuharlimManagement Sciences for Health, Medford, MA, USA.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development 7200AA18C00074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis assessment aimed to identify the degree and parameters of demand for support from HTAsiaLink, the Asia regional health technology assessment (HTA) hub, for HTA ecosystem development.

methodsA sequential, exploratory, mixed-method design was implemented, starting with a literature review to define the Asia region's HTA landscape. Then an online survey was sent to 125 Asia-focused HTA practitioners and support organizations to obtain their thoughts on HTA development needs and how a regional hub could serve them. Finally, fifty purposively selected key informants representing government HTA agencies in Asia, funding partner organizations, philanthropic foundations, global HTA support, and regional HTA hub organizations were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Nineteen Asian countries and territories were represented in documents reviewed. Twenty-five recipients from ten Asian countries and territories responded to the survey, and twenty-eight individuals from eight Asian countries and territories plus eight international organizations participated in interviews.

resultsIdentified needs include support to fill HTA human resources gaps, strengthen the capacity of the existing HTA workforce, produce HTA public goods, improve harmonization within and across country systems, and strengthen political will. Other important considerations include the need to adapt the hub's purpose to an expanding role and adopt sustainable financing approaches accordingly.

conclusionDemand for an HTA hub in Asia is high, including to support HTA technical, deliberative processes, and institutional capacity strengthening. Findings underscore the importance of both conducting HTAs and fostering demand for HTA output. HTAsiaLink is recognized as well-positioned to play an expanded support role to address these needs.

Indexed as

Technology Assessment, BiomedicalAsiaHumansNeeds AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAsiacapacity strengtheninghealthtechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID40276803
PMCPMC12123160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.